Archivo:Rómulo Betancourt-1966.jpg
Rómulo_Betancourt-1966.jpg (380 × 480 píxeles; tamaño de archivo: 35 kB; tipo MIME: image/jpeg)
Este es un archivo de Wikimedia Commons, un depósito de contenido libre hospedado por la Fundación Wikimedia. Más abajo se reproduce su página de descripción con la información sobre su origen y licencia. |
Se ha solicitado el borrado de esta página o archivo de acuerdo a las normas de borrado de Commons desde el 11 junio 2024. Para discutirlo, por favor haz clic aquí.
No quites esta etiqueta hasta que la discusión concluya. Motivo de la solicitud del borrado: Continuing from Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Bettmann_Archive_photos. All photos nominated here are post-1963 US images, ranging from 1964 to the 1980s. These photos claim to be in the public domain due to 'lack of notice' using the {{PD-US-no notice}} template. However, there is little to no proof of that.
My main concern is not that we are violating the copyright of a stock site, but that there is not enough proof these images actually meet the PD no-notice tag criteria. I am not denying they were published, rather the 'no notice' claims are hard to prove and assumptions are being made here. The first problem is that we cannot see the entire print, sheet or strip to verify the lack of notice claims. The copyright notice would not be on the photo like a watermark; it would be elsewhere. Getty only shows the high-resolution scan of the front. An example of an image that shows no notice, this UPI photo: File:Senator Ross Bass "On the Job!" (1965 UPI press photo).jpg, can be seen on the rear. Most of these photographs from the Bettmann Archive could very well be public domain, but without seeing the whole photo or its backside where a notice might be, its copyright status is uncertain. Assuming it's public domain without further verification is risky. The second problem is that almost all photos are credited to an 'unknown author.' How are we supposed to know who took the photo? Otto Bettmann was the collector of these photos, not the creator or copyright holder, and neither is Getty. Many photos come from various sources and creators, and I did see some that are credited to UPI, a press agency, so perhaps other copies exist elsewhere. This is also problematic for photos from 1978 and later, as we cannot really search for registrations. For pre-1964 photos, we can search for renewals, so it is not the same concern as with the 1964-1989 photos. Essentially, any and all photos could be Public Domain, but there is a serious lack of evidence to back up those claims. I am making this mass DR as I have doubts on the freedom of these files, but also for a consensus. What do we do with all these photos? There are millions more in the archive that could be useful to the Commons. Would love to hear others opinions on this. | |||
Haz clic aquí para mostrar el resto de instrucciones
Si esta plantilla se ha añadido porque has hecho clic en "Nominate for deletion" en el menú de la izquierda, por favor asegúrate de que todas las páginas necesarias se hayan creado. Si no se han creado después de unos minutos, o si se ha añadido la plantilla de forma manual, debes completar estos pasos:
{{subst:delete2|image=Files found with Bettmann|reason=Continuing from Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Bettmann_Archive_photos. All photos nominated here are post-1963 US images, ranging from 1964 to the 1980s. These photos claim to be in the public domain due to 'lack of notice' using the {{PD-US-no notice}} template. However, there is little to no proof of that.
My main concern is not that we are violating the copyright of a stock site, but that there is not enough proof these images actually meet the PD no-notice tag criteria. I am not denying they were published, rather the 'no notice' claims are hard to prove and assumptions are being made here. The first problem is that we cannot see the entire print, sheet or strip to verify the lack of notice claims. The copyright notice would not be on the photo like a watermark; it would be elsewhere. Getty only shows the high-resolution scan of the front. An example of an image that shows no notice, this UPI photo: File:Senator Ross Bass "On the Job!" (1965 UPI press photo).jpg, can be seen on the rear. Most of these photographs from the Bettmann Archive could very well be public domain, but without seeing the whole photo or its backside where a notice might be, its copyright status is uncertain. Assuming it's public domain without further verification is risky. The second problem is that almost all photos are credited to an 'unknown author.' How are we supposed to know who took the photo? Otto Bettmann was the collector of these photos, not the creator or copyright holder, and neither is Getty. Many photos come from various sources and creators, and I did see some that are credited to UPI, a press agency, so perhaps other copies exist elsewhere. This is also problematic for photos from 1978 and later, as we cannot really search for registrations. For pre-1964 photos, we can search for renewals, so it is not the same concern as with the 1964-1989 photos. Essentially, any and all photos could be Public Domain, but there is a serious lack of evidence to back up those claims. I am making this mass DR as I have doubts on the freedom of these files, but also for a consensus. What do we do with all these photos? There are millions more in the archive that could be useful to the Commons. Would love to hear others opinions on this.}} ~~~~
Para borrado masivo: Si deseas nominar varias imágenes relacionadas, por favor, haz una solicitud masiva agregando manualmente {{delete|reason|group-name}} a cada página de imagen y luego sigue los pasos anteriores. (Ayuda en solicitudes masivas). Nota: Esta plantilla es para solicitudes de borrado de archivos que podrían necesitar discusión. Para borrado rápido, puedes usar {{speedy|razón}}.
|
Resumen
DescripciónRómulo Betancourt-1966.jpg |
English: 04 Oct 1966, Caracas, Venezuela --- Caracas: Romulo Betancourt portrait. --- Image by © Bettmann/CORBIS |
Fecha | |
Fuente | https://www.biografiasyvidas.com/biografia/b/betancourt.htm |
Autor | Bettmann/CORBIS |
Licencia
Este archivo está disponible bajo la licencia Creative Commons Dedicación de Dominio Público CC0 1.0 Universal. | |
La persona que ha asociado una obra a este documento lo dedica al dominio público mediante la cesión mundial de sus derechos bajo la ley de derechos de autor y todos los derechos legales adyacentes propios de dicha, en el ámbito permitido por ley. Puedes copiar, modificar, distribuir y reproducir el trabajo, incluso con objetivos comerciales, sin pedir aprobación del autor.
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.enCC0Creative Commons Zero, Public Domain Dedicationfalsefalse |
Elementos representados en este archivo
representa a
1 ene 1966
image/jpeg
Historial del archivo
Haz clic sobre una fecha y hora para ver el archivo tal como apareció en ese momento.
Fecha y hora | Miniatura | Dimensiones | Usuario | Comentario | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
actual | 15:14 19 abr 2023 | 380 × 480 (35 kB) | Ernesto Rosales 1103 | Uploaded a work by Bettmann/CORBIS from https://www.biografiasyvidas.com/biografia/b/betancourt.htm with UploadWizard |
Usos del archivo
La siguiente página usa este archivo:
Uso global del archivo
Las wikis siguientes utilizan este archivo:
- Uso en en.wikipedia.org
Metadatos
Este archivo contiene información adicional, probablemente añadida por la cámara digital o el escáner usado para crearlo o digitalizarlo.
Si el archivo ha sido modificado desde su estado original, pueden haberse perdido algunos detalles.
Versión IIM | 2 |
---|---|
Titular de los derechos de autor | © Corbis. All Rights Reserved. |
Crédito/proveedor | © Bettmann/CORBIS |
Título de la imagen | 04 Oct 1966, Caracas, Venezuela --- Caracas: Romulo Betancourt portrait. --- Image by © Bettmann/CORBIS |
Encabezado | Portrait of Venezuelan's President Romulo Betancourt |
Título breve | U1363962F |
Código de ubicación de transmisión original | 13014064 |
Instrucciones especiales | For latest restrictions check www.corbis.com |