Usuaria:Jaluj/Brecha de genero enlaces

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force/related_resources
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force/projects
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force/Media_and_research
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force/research
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2015-08-19/Op-ed
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Countering_systemic_bias/Gender_gap_task_force/Archive_2#Ghettoization_about_removing_women_categories.3F.3F

Related projects

• Wikipedia Women, a Facebook page
• Sarah Steirch’s “Scoop It” reporting on Women and Wikimedia
• Postcolonial Digital Humanities "Rewriting Wikipedia" project
• Wikistorming, New School Femtech project's Wikipedia page
• Geek Feminism Wiki, a Wikia "resource for and about women in geek communities" includes featured articles, FAQ, links to communities, resources, organizations, link to GeekFeminism blog which focuses on harassment and abuse of women in technological communities. Of particular interest:

• Sample statement of purpose for communities including men
• "Code of conduct" banning harassing behavior
• How to create anti-harassment policies for conferences
• Sexualized environment
• Free sexism consulting (i.e., problems with asking women to fix problems created by men)

• WikiHow has a large portion of women editors which is attributed in part to its friendly interface and guidelines. See this Wikhow presentation at Wikimania 2012, at Youtube.com
• The Ada Initiative, a non-profit working to increase participation of women in open technology and culture
• Women, Action & the Media, dedicated to building a robust, effective, inclusive movement for gender justice in media
• Media Report To Women provides information on all types of media, how they depict women and related issues of interest to women.
• How to encourage women in Linux, the Linux Documentation project, a model for action
• FemTechNet Vimeo.com site

Research studies/writings on similar topics and/or communities

• Deborah Tannen, The Argument Culture, Ballantine, 1999, Chapter "Fast Forward: Technologically Enhanced Aggression", section, "Gender on the Internet"
• Jodi K. Biber, Dennis Doverspike, Daniel Baznik, Alana Cober, and Barbara A. Ritter, Sexual Harassment in Online Communications: Effects of Gender and Discourse Medium, CyberPsychology & Behavior. February 2002, 5(1): 33-42. DOI. Found that "in terms of gender differences, women rated online pictures and jokes as significantly more harassing than men."
• «The Gender Gap». Journalism.com. Pew Research Center. 23 de mayo de 2005.  regarding women writers, researchers and academics' blogging to publish their thoughts and experiences.
• Johnston, Anne; Friedman, Barbara; Peach, Sara (2011). «Standpoint in Political Blogs: Voice, Authority, and Issues». Women's Studies 40 (3): 269-298 – via Taylor & Francis.  DOI
• Marilyn Livosky, Terry F. Pettijohn II, Jillian R. Capo, Reducing Sexist Attitudes as a Result of Completing an Undergraduate Psychology of Gender Course, Psychology and Education, An Interdisciplinary Journal, July 3, 2012, DOI.
• Report: Social network demographics in 2012, Pingdom, August 21, 2012. Comparison of numbers of women on the most popular social media sites.
• Robin Wilson (22 October 2012). «Scholarly Publishing's Gender Gap». The Chronicle of Higher Education. 
• Women’s Media Center Report Finds Women Still Underrepresented, Misrepresented in U.S. Media, Women's Media Center, February 19, 2014

• See also overview Amanda Hess (19 February 2014). «Women Are Scarce in Journalism, Film, and TV, and the Numbers Aren't Budging». The XX Factor. Slate. 

Interesting blog and other articles

• "Fannie", "DoubleX" Writer: No Sexism in Wikipedia, Fannie's Room blog, February 16, 2011. Commentary on Heather Mac Donald's article Wikipedia is Male Dominated. That Doesn't Mean It's Sexist, Slate magazine, February 9, 2011
• Mallary Jean Tenore, Why women don’t contribute to opinion pages as often as men & what we can do about it, Poynter Institute, February 25, 2011
• Lola "PR", Why women and wikis do mix..., personal blog, March 6, 2011 (Note:Slight advertising delay.)
• Karen Rustad, "Suck It Up, Princess": Outreach and Diversity in FOSS Communities, Karen Rustad website, May 13, 2011
• Elizabeth Laferriere, The Online Gender Gap: Why Don't More Women Participate in Online Forums?, Mic.com, November 28, 2011
• Margaret Robertson, In which I don’t try to write like a man, personal web site, December 13, 2011
• Tom Morris, News Flash: Sexism in geek communities demeans everyone, TomMorris.org, March 23, 2012
• Gregory Kohs, Women editors growing scarce at Wikipedia, Wikipediocracy, May 16, 2012
• Nathalie Collida and friends, Wikipedia: Men and children first, Wikipediocracy, January 22, 2013
• Adrienne Wadewitz, Wikipedia is pushing the boundaries of scholarly practice but the gender gap must be addressed, London School of Economics and Politicial Science blog, April 9, 2013
• Nathalie Collida and Andreas Kolbe, Wikipedia's culture of sexism, Wikipediocracy, April 29, 2013
• Kate Dries (6 June 2014). «There's a Battle Going on Over the Wikipedia Page for #YesAllWomen». Jezebel.  See also Wikipedia article "YesAllWomen".

• Zuleyk Zevallos, Sexism on Wikipedia: Why the #YesAllWomen Edits Matter, personal blog, June 8, 2014

• Andreas Kolbe with Nathalie Collida, "Why Women Have No Time For Wikipedia: Thoughts on the Online Encyclopedia's Gender Imbalance," Wikipediocracy, August 26, 2014

Misogyny and internet harassment

• Steven Musil. "Medium cracks down on cyberbullying in rules update. Blog publishing platform joins growing list of sites banning threats, harassment and revenge porn."CNET, 2015-07-27.

• Rose Eveleth. "How to Deter Doxxing. Newsroom strategies to prevent the harassment that follows the public posting of home addresses, phone numbers and journalists’ other personal information." The Daily Beast, 2015-07-17.

• Tauriq Moosa. "This Ruling Could Change Online “Free Speech” Forever. A Canadian court case could change the way we handle Internet harassment and ‘free speech.’" The Daily Beast, 2015-07-15.

• John Wihbey and Leighton Walter Kille. "'Internet harassment and online threats targeting women: Research review'". Journalist's Resource, Harvard Kennedy School, Shorenstein Center, 2015-07-13.

• Jack Smith IV. The World's Most Popular Video Game Fights Racist Harassment With Artificial Intelligence, Tech.Mic. July 13, 2015.

• Sumana Harihareswara, "Hospitality, Jerks, and What I Learned", Opening keynote address at Wiki Conference USA, May 30, 2014, in New York City. (inludes audio recording)

• Violet Blue, "Quora's misogyny problem: A cautionary tale", ZDNet, June 22, 2014. Quote: "Sites that care can educate their admins and mods about online harassment, on detecting racist and sexist language, on conflict resolution and conflict diffusion, target and non-target status, and backhanded attacks (aka 'poisoning the well')."

• Maeve Duggan, "Online Harassment", Pew Research Internet Project, October 22, 2014. Survey by the Pew Research Center. (See Slate review below.)

• Amanda Hess, "On the Internet, Men Are Called Names. Women Are Stalked and Sexually Harassed". Slate, Oct. 22 2014. “Women are significantly more likely than men to report being stalked or sexually harassed on the internet” while men receive more physical threats. (Review of Pew Research Internet Project survey.)

• Anne-Sophie Brändlin, "Five campaigns against sexual harassment that you should know", Deutsche Welle, October 31, 2014. Viral online video campaigns against sexual harassment.

• Samantha Allen. For Women on the Internet, It Doesn't Get Better. The Daily Dot, Jul 16, 2014.

Policy and legal considerations

• "Harassment", U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Description of offensive conduct regarded as employment discrimination that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, (ADA).

• "Sexual Harassment that Creates a Hostile Work Environment", The Advocates for Human Rights, 15 April 2007. International considerations, links to research and country-specific standards.

• “Marwick, Alice E.; Miller, Ross W. Online Harassment, Defamation and Hateful Speech: A Primer of the Legal Landscape.” Fordham Center on Law and Information Policy Report No. 2, June 2014.

• Lori MacVittie, "Is Social Media a Hostile Work Environment?", DevCentral, April 29, 2009. The dangers of making interaction with social media an “official” part of someone’s job role.

• "Volunteer May Sue Nonprofits For Harassment Under Title VII", Nonprofit Issues. Don Kramer's "An electronic newsletter of 'Nonprofit Law You Need To Know'" review of Volling v. Antioch Rescue Squad, involving a woman volunteer for two nonprofit emergency ambulance services.

• Tamiya N. Wilkes, "Volunteer Firefighter Stated a Claim for Hostile Work Environment Based on Racial Harassment", Attorneys At Law Semmes, November 2009. Review of Pernell Hammond v. Taneytown Volunteer Fire Company involving a volunteer firefighter and hostile work environment based on race.

• "Mozilla Community Participation Guidelines", Mozilla, January 7, 2013. "Inclusion and Diversity Program" (how to report problems), expected interaction style, and the "Conductors group" for training people to communicate.

• Eugene Volokh, "Freedom of Speech in Cyberspace from the Listener's Perspective" U Chicago Legal Forum 377, 414-21, 1996. A collection of examples--mostly excerpts from published law review articles--of how workplace harassment law is increasingly being applied to areas outside of the workplace: "public accommodations" like libraries, restaurants, bookstores, and online services.

• Ellen Simon, "Gender Based Profanity Constitutes Sexual Harassment" Employee Rights Post, January 27, 2010. Review of Reeves v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. "A constant flow of profanity in the workplace can constitute sexual harassment and gender discrimination" regardless of whether it is addressed to anyone directly.

• Medium Rules, blog publishing platform

• Nondiscrimination policy, Wikimedia Foundation.

Wikimedia.org projects

Gender gap projects

• Gender Gap project at Wikimedia and related pages:

• Gender Gap Stories
• Gender Gap Manifesto
• Gender Gap Policy Revolution
• Gender gap strategy page reviews three years of women's meetings on strategy.
• List of proposals for more female editors 2011
• Gender Gap email list details

• Women on Wikipedia Month (For example: Category: Womens History Month, India 2014)
• Women on Wikipedia Week
• WikiWomen's Collaborative

• Wikiwomens Collaborative report, phase 1
• Wikiwomen blog at Wikimedia

• WikiWomen Camp 2012

• Category:WikiWomenCamp - women perspective by country

• 2013 Gender gap India work plan 2013
• What Gender Is Wikipedia (Gender in languages)
• See also Category:Gender gap

Diversity projects

• Wikimediafoundation Answers: "Foundation: How does the Wikimedia Foundation support diversity?", accessed August 12, 2014
• Charting Diversity main page links to Charting Diversity study mentioned above.

• Diversity Dialogue page

• Diversity Conference 2014

• Diversity Conference 2014 documentation
• Diversity Conference 2014 videos
• Wikimedia blog entry about Diversity Conference 2014

Outreach project

• Outreach.Wikimedia main page

  (Galleries, Libraries, Archives, Museums attracts a lot of women in these fields

  Education project attracts a lot of women educators

• Outreach program for women presentation at Wikimedia Foundation meeting, February 7, 2013. Program is part of the FOSS Outreach Program for Women at Mediawiki.org which works to get more women involved in open source software engineering. The parent organization's page is Outreach Program for Women - GNOME Wiki!

Wikimedia blog entries

• Sage Ross, Wikipedia’s gender gap, February 1, 2011
• LiAnna Davis, Campus Ambassador program tackles gender gap, March 31, 2011
• Sarah Stierch, Women, we can do it: A conversation with Anastasia Lvova, October 16, 2012
• Sarah Stierch, Wikiwomen Unite, September 26, 2012
• Sarah Stierch, Wikipedia Club Pune celebrates WikiWomen Day, November 5th, 2012
• Samir Sharbaty, “Egyptian students help narrow gender gap on Wikipedia”, December 9, 2013
• Amanda Menking, Creating Safe Spaces, July 14, 2014
• Lodewijk Gelauff, Sixty ways to help new editors, September 4, 2014

Sue Gardner essays

Sue Gardner was executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation) from 2007 to 2014 and lead the Wikimedia Foundation's initial efforts to close the gender gap. These essays from her blog provide an insight on her thinking about the gender gap during that period.

• Sue Gardner, Unlocking the Clubhouse: Five ways to encourage women to edit Wikipedia, personal blog, November 14, 2010
• Sue Gardner, Nine Reasons Women Don’t Edit Wikipedia (in their own words), personal blog, February 19, 2011
• Sue Gardner, On editorial judgment, and empathy, personal blog,September 28, 2011
• Top 10 Reasons to Encourage more Women Participation in Wikipedia, February 8, 2011

Wikimania

• Wikimania. The last several years have included several workshops and speeches about the gendergap.
• WikiWomen's lunches have been held at several Wikimanias

En.Wikipedia Gender gap projects

Wikiprojects

See links to English-language Wikipedia Gender gap-related wikiprojects on the Gender gap task force main page.

Resources

See links to English-language Wikipedia Gender gap-related resources on the Gender gap task force main page.

Sign Post articles

• Widespread discussions about the low participation of women in Wikipedia, February 7, 2011
• In the News: How to achieve a 94% female contributor ratio on a wiki, March 7, 2011
• WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism, by Mabeenot, March 7, 2011
• Recent research: Gender gap connected to conflict aversion and lower confidence among women, February 27, 2012
• Recent research: Survey participation bias analysis: More Wikipedia editors are female, married or parents than previously assumed, July 31, 2013
• Audio interview with Lila Tretikov, Wikimedia Foundation's new executive director, includes comments on the gender gap, June 25, 2014

Wikipedia articles

• Criticism of Wikipedia#Gender bias
• Gender bias on Wikipedia
• Sex ratio: gender imbalance
• Gender-neutral pronoun: Modern solutions
• Gender neutral language policy proposal

Relevant essays

• Wikipedia is Also a Woman (related to Women on Wikipedia Month on Wikimedia.
• See also Category:Feminist essays

Women-related article lists

• See Category:Women and List of lists of women.
• Wikiproject Countering Systemic Bias Open Tasks/Women and women's studies
• Wikproject Feminism Open Tasks
• Wikiproject Gender Studies Article alerts
• Missing women list - done May 2015
• User:Dsp13's List of womenarticles needing creation
• User:99of9's Chart of articles regarding Forbes "100 power women".
• List by User:Rosiestep of Spanish language Wikipedia articles about women that need English versions

Workshops and Edit-a-thons

(Small sample of selected events of interest.)

• Wikipedia:Workshop for Women
• Wikipedia:How to run an edit-a-thon includes List_of_edit-a-thons in English or in English-speaking countries
• GLAM/Case studies/Smithsonian Institution Archives/Women in Science Edit-a-thon, April 2012
• Matthew Roth Fem-Tech Edit-a-thon sparks discussions about Wikipedia gender gap, Blog.Wikimedia, November 26, 2012
• Nicole Swinford, College Hosts ‘Feminist, Anti-Racist Wikipedia Edit-a-thon’, Chapman University, "TheCollegeFix.com", December 3, 2012 (“Wikistorm”)
• Siko Bouterse, Let’s throw more Wikipedia editing parties, Blog.Wikimedia, January 23, 2013
• D. McGaughey-Summers, Taking On Wikipedia’s Bias, regarding heckling at a New York University Wikiwomen event, June 20th, 2013
• Hack for change - A Hackathon for women's rights, December 2013, Wikimedia Chapter (India) sponsored edit-a-thon regarding violence against women

• See report by L. Sarah, Taking back the tech – using Wikipedia to stop violence against women, Rising voices, December 2013

• Robby Soave, Wikipedia is ‘very masculine,’ so feminists pledge to fix it, Daily Caller, February 2, 2014
• Avishay Artsy, Edit-a-thons aim to erase Wikipedia’s gender gap, KCRW, February 12, 2014
• Upping the Female Quotient: Berkeley Edit-a-thon Recruits and Trains New Wikipedians, California magazine, April 4, 2014
• Jessica Pressler, Love and Drama at the Wikipedia Conference, New York Magazine, June 6, 2014 (Re: Wikiconference USA 2014)
• August 2014 Canberra "Wikibomb" information
• See also Category:WikiWomen events
• See also India Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon!, March 9, 2014; India has very active women's program

Help pages

• Wikipedia:Help main help page leads to all resources
• Wikipedia:Teahouse answers especially new editors questions; formed with new women editors in mind
• Wikipedia:Help_desk answers specific questions for editors old and new
• Wikipedia:Editor assistance answers specific questions for editors old and new
• Wikipedia:Dispute resolution outlines processes for dealing with disputes, including a list of noticeboards and how and when to use them
• Wikimedia Outreach Bookshelf has many tutorial resources for this and other Wikimedia projects
• Wikipedia:Dispute resolution, explains various Wikipedia processes
• "Editing Wikipedia", 20-page brochure in downloadable PDF format

Audio and video

• Wikimedia outreach tutorial videos
• How to Edit a Wikipedia Article
• Editing on Wikipedia, Adrianne Wadewitz, Vimeo.com, 2013

Images

• Change the Ratio
• Yes we can edit

Civility issues

These are of particular interest to many women and men.

At Wikimedia Foundation

• Terms of Use - Wikimedia Foundation

At Wikimedia.org

• Terms of Use: Civility and related minefields
• Friendly space policy (Note: Discussion about overly vague language might be appropriate.)
• Andrea Weckerle, Foreward by Jimmy Wales, Civility in the Digital Age: How Companies and People Can Triumph over Haters, Trolls, Bullies and Other Jerks, Que Publishing, 2013,, various pages.ISBN 978-0-13-313498-8
• Jimmy Wales, Speech on Civility to Wikimania 2014, London, August 11, 2014, (unofficial transcript) and video of the speech

• According to New York Magazine in 2014, "Wikipedia famously bears one of the starkest gender gaps in contemporary culture."​ Estimates of the percentage of Wikipedians who are female range from 8.5 to 16.1 percent.​

The gender gap means not only that most articles are written by men, but that most of the content policies are too, including the notability and sourcing policies. These policies determine which articles about women can be hosted, and frame how they are written and sourced. As of January 2015 just 15.5 percent of the 1,445,021 biographies on the English Wikipedia were about women. As a result of notability and sourcing issues, almost all Wikipedia's pre-20th-century biographies are of men.​

Forthcoming

• Julia Adams, Hannah Brückner, "Wikipedia and the Democratization of Academic Knowledge", National Science Foundation.

2015

September–July

• J. F. Sargent, Abigail Brady, "Wikipedia Hates Women: 4 Dark Sides of The Site We All Use", Cracked, 15 August 2015.
• Caitlin Grimes, "WVU hiring Wikipedian to bridge Wikipedia 'gender gap'", Campus Reform, 21 July 2015.
• Carl Straumsheim, "University hopes 'Wikipedian in residence' will tackle gender gap", Times Higher Education, 20 July 2015.

June–April

• Anupama Mili, "'Few Women in Wiki Editing'", The New Indian Express, 26 June 2015.
• Emma Reynolds, "Australians fill in the gaps on Wikipedia", news.com.au, 11 June 2015.
• Cyndi Moritz, "Project Aims to Raise Profile of Women Architects on Wikipedia", Syracuse University, 1 June 2015.
• Jenny Kleeman, "The Wikipedia wars: does it matter if our biggest source of knowledge is written by men?", New Statesman, 26 May 2015.
• Bryce Peake, "WP:THREATENING2MEN: Misogynist Infopolitics and the Hegemony of the Asshole Consensus on English Wikipedia", Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, April 2015 (published by the Wikipedia Signpost, 19 August 2015).
• Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Mohsen Jadidi, Markus Strohmaier, "It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia", AAAI Publications, Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 21 April 2015.
• Sara Boboltz, "Editors Are Trying To Fix Wikipedia's Gender And Racial Bias Problem", The Huffington Post, 15 April 2015.

March–January

• Tyler Hellard, "Wiki gap", This Magazine, 19 March 2015.
• Mina Kim, "Wikipedia's Gender and Race Gaps", KQED Radio, 13 March 2015.
• Hannah Ghorashi, "Art+Feminism’s 2015 Wikipedia Edit-a-thon Adds 334 Articles on Female Artists", Art News, 10 March 2015.
• Amanda Marcotte, "On Wikipedia, Gamergate Refuses to Die", Slate, 6 March 2015.
• Lauren C. Williams, "The ‘Five Horsemen’ Of Wikipedia Paid The Price For Getting Between Trolls And Their Victims", Think Progress, 6 March 2015.
• Issie Lapowsky, "Meet the Editors Fighting Racism and Sexism on Wikipedia", Wired, 5 March 2015.
• John Paul Titlow, "Think Wikipedia Is Sexist? They Want To Pay You To Help Change That", Fast Company, 5 March 2015.
• Glynis Board, "Wiki Gender Gap to Be Discussed in Morgantown", West Virginia Public Broadcasting, 3 March 2015.
• Dawn Eyestone, "Wikipedia, Controversy, and the Myth of Neutrality", PopMatters, 23 February 2015.
• Victoria McNally, "Art+Feminism Is Hosting Its Second Ever Wikipedia Edit-a-thon To Promote Gender Equality", The Mary Sue, 18 February 2015.
• Kendra Hanna, "Feminists aim to fix the Wikipedia gender gap", The Daily of the University of Washington, 16 February 2015.
• Jason Wilson, "Are misogynists running Wikipedia?", Overland, 11 February 2015.
• Eduardo Graells-Garrido, Mounia Lalmas, Filippo Menczer, "First Women, Second Sex: Gender Bias in Wikipedia", arxiv, 9 February 2015.
• James Dean, "Wikipedia editors are accused of sexism", The Times, 5 February 2015.
• David Auerbach, "The Wikipedia Ouroboros", Slate, 5 February 2015.
• John Paul Titlow, "More Like Dude-ipedia: Study Shows Wikipedia's Sexist Bias", Fast Company, 2 February 2015.
• "Computational Linguistics Reveals How Wikipedia Articles Are Biased Against Women", MIT Technology Review, 2 February 2015 (re: arΧiv:1501.06307).
• Michael Mandiberg, "The Affective Labor of Wikipedia: GamerGate, Harassment, and Peer Production", Social Text, 1 February 2015.
• Andy Cush, "The Gamergate Decision Shows Exactly What's Broken About Wikipedia", Gawker, 30 January 2015.
• Richard Adhikari, "Gamergate Bleeds Into Wikipedia", Tech News World, 30 January 2015.
• Caitlin Dewey, "Gamergate, Wikipedia and the limits of 'human knowledge'", The Washington Post, 29 January 2015.
• Sravanth Verma, "Gamergate sucks in Wikipedia with ban controversy", Digital Journal, 29 January 2015.
• Adi Robertson, "Wikipedia denies 'purging' feminist editors over Gamergate debate", The Verge, 28 January 2015.
• Go Phightins! and Harry Mitchell, "Thirteen editors sanctioned in mammoth GamerGate arbitration case", The Signpost (Wikipedia), 28 January 2015.
• Masem and Protonk, "Evaluating the Arbitration Committee's handling of GamerGate", The Signpost (Wikipedia), 28 January 2015.
• Carolyn Cox, "Wikipedia Organizations Address Gamergate Editor Controversy: Women Are 'Invaluable Contributors'", The Mary Sue, 28 January 2015.
• Claudia Wagner, David Garcia, Mohsen Jadidi, Markus Strohmaier, "It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia", arXiv, 26 January 2015. arΧiv:1501.06307
• Philippe Beaudette, "Civility, Wikipedia, and the conversation on Gamergate", Wikimedia Foundation, 27 January 2015.
• Alanna Bennett, "Wikipedia Has Banned Five Feminist Editors From Gamergate Articles & More", The Mary Sue, 24 January 2015.
• Andy Cush, "Wikipedia Purged a Group of Feminist Editors Because of Gamergate", Gawker, 23 January 2015.
• Nathaniel Mott, "Wikipedia tacitly endorses GamerGate by blocking its opponents from editing gender-related articles", PandoDaily, 23 January 2015.
• Alex Hern, "Wikipedia votes to ban some editors from gender-related articles", The Guardian, 23 January 2015.
• Dawn Leonard Tripp, "How to Edit Wikipedia: Lessons from a Female Contributor", Anita Borg Institute, 13 January 2015.
• Nathaniel Tkacz, Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness, University of Chicago Press, 2015.

2014

December–October

• David Auerbach, "Encyclopedia Frown: Wikipedia is amazing. But it's become a rancorous, sexist, elitist, stupidly bureaucratic mess.", Slate, 11 December 2014.
• Stephanie Pappas, "Wikipedia's Gender Problem Gets a Closer Look", LiveScience, 3 December 2014.
• Amy Goodman, "Women Are Being Driven Offline ..." , Democracy Now, 20 October 2014 (Anita Sarkeesian interview).
• David Bamman, Noel Smith, "Unsupervised Discovery of Biographical Structure from Text", Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2, October 2014, pp. 363–376.

September–July

• Daniela Iosub, et al, "Emotions under Discussion: Gender, Status and Communication in Online Collaboration", PLOS ONE, 20 August 2014.
• Caroline Hepker, "Wikipedia 'completely failed' to fix gender imbalance", BBC News, 8 August 2014 (Jimmy Wales interview).
• Anne Perkins, "Whose truth is Wikipedia guarding?", The Guardian, 7 August 2014.
• Joe Miller, Wiki wars: Do Wikipedia's internal tiffs deter newcomers?, BBC News, 5 August 2014.
• Ilona Buchem, et al, "Charting Diversity", Wikimedia Deutschland, August 2014 (see Charting diversity).
• Elizabeth Harrington, "Government-Funded Study: Why Is Wikipedia Sexist?", Washington Free Beacon, 30 July 2014.
• Danika Fears, "Why is Wikipedia so sexist?", New York Post, 30 July 2014.
• Kelly Cohen, "US science group to study sexism at one of the most popular websites in the world", Washington Examiner, 30 July 2014.
• Lauren Barbato, "Wikipedia Sexism Is So Entrenched, Even The Government's Trying To Fix It", Bustle, 30 July 2014.

June–April

• Jordan Pearson, "Editing Sexism out of Wikipedia", Motherboard, 12 June 2014.
• Zuleyka Zevallos, "Sexism on Wikipedia: Why the #YesAllWomen Edits Matter", OtherSociologist, 8 June 2014.
• Jemielniak Dariusz, Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Stanford University Press, 2014.
• Sumana Harihareswara, "Hospitality, Jerks, and What I Learned", keynote address at Wiki Conference USA, 30 May 2014 (includes video).
• Sarah Sentilles, "Writing Her In: Wikipedia As Feminist Activism", Ms. magazine, 21 May 2014.
• Tracy Wholf, "‘Wikipedian’ editor took on website’s gender gap", PBS NewsHour, 18 May 2014 (about Adrianne Wadewitz).
• Young-Ho Eom, et al, "Interactions of cultures and top people of Wikipedia from ranking of 24 language editions", arXiv. org. arΧiv:1405.7183
• Lynsea Garrison, "How can Wikipedia woo women editors?", BBC News Magazine, 7 April 2014.

March–January

• Kevin Mathews, "How Women Are Trying to Make Wikipedia Less Sexist", Care2, 18 March 2014.
• Nora Young, "Wikipedia gender gap", CBC Radio, 16 March 2014.
• Victoria Turk, "The Mission to Get Women Scientists on Wikipedia", Motherboard, 4 March 2014.
• Kat Stoeffel, "Closing Wikipedia’s Gender Gap — Reluctantly", New York Magazine, 11 February 2014.
• Julie Bort, "A Growing Army Of Women Are Taking On Wikipedia's Sexism Problem", Business Insider, 15 February 2014.
• Lennart Guldbrandsson, "Wikipedia: A Field report", Culture Unbound, 6, 2014, pp. 633–636.
• Kate Knibbs, "Chipping away at Wikipedia's gender bias, one article at a time", The Daily Dot, 10 February 2014.
• Sarah Mirk, "An Epic Feminist Edit-a-Thon Takes Aim at Wikipedia's Gender Gap", Bitch Media, 24 January 2014.
• Eszter Hargittai, Aaron Shaw, "Internet Skills and Wikipedia's Gender Inequality", Berkman Center for Internet & Society, 21 January 2014.
• Netha Hussain, "Countering the Systemic Bias on Wikipedia: An Interview With Emily Temple-Wood", The Huffington Post, 4 January 2014.
• Amanda Hess, "Why Women Aren’t Welcome on the Internet", Pacific Standard, 6 January 2014.

2013

December–October

• Olivia Biller, "Three Obstacles to Underrepresented Peoples on Wikipedia: the Role Edit-a-Thons Have to Play", The Black Sheep Journal, 13 November 2013.
• Stine Eckert, Linda Steiner, "(Re)triggering Backlash: Responses to News About Wikipedia's Gender Gap", Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(4), October 2013, pp. 284–303. doi 10.1177/0196859913505618
• Robinson Meyer, "90% of Wikipedia's Editors Are Male—Here's What They're Doing About It", The Atlantic, 25 October 2013.
• Alex Hern, "Chelsea Manning name row: Wikipedia editors banned from trans pages", The Guardian, 24 October 2013.
• Robinson Meyer, "To Fix Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance: A Big Editing Party?", The Atlantic, 10 October 2013.

September–July

• Alex Hern, "Chelsea Manning gets put back in the closet by Wikipedia", New Statesmen, 4 September 2013.
• Sue Gardner, "How Wikipedia got it wrong on Chelsea Manning, and why", suegardner.org, 4 September 2013.
• Jay Hathaway, "Wikipedia decides Chelsea Manning will remain 'Bradley' for now", Daily Dot, 31 August 2013.
• Alex Hern, "Behind the Wikipedia wars: what happened when Bradley Manning became Chelsea", New Statesman, 23 August 2013.
• Nina Liss-Schultz, "Can These Students Fix Wikipedia's Lady Problem?", Mother Jones, 23 August 2013.
• Mark Joseph Stern, "Wikipedia Beats Major News Organizations, Perfectly Reflects Chelsea Manning’s New Gender", Slate, 22 August 2013.
• Keira Huang, "Wikipedia fails to bridge gender gap", South China Morning Post, 11 August 2013.
• Adrianne Wadewitz, "Wikipedia's gender gap and the complicated reality of systemic gender bias", HASTAC, 26 July 2013.
• Meghan Neal, "Wikipedia Isn't Quite as Sexist as Everyone Thinks", Motherboard, 22 July 2013.
• Amanda Filipacchi (10 July 2013). «My Strange Addiction: Wikipedia». The Wall Street Journal. 

June–April

• Benjamin Mako Hill, Aaron Shaw, "The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation", PLOS ONE, 26 June 2013 (estimates that 16.1% of editors are female).
• Maximilian Klein, "Sex Ratios in Wikidata, Wikipedias, and VIAF", hangingtogether.org, 13 May 2013.
• Andrew Leonard, "Revenge, ego and the corruption of Wikipedia", Salon, 17 May 2013.
• Adrianne Wadewitz, "Who speaks for the women of Wikipedia? Not the women of Wikipedia", HASTAC, 1 May 2013.
• Sue Gardner (then-executive director Wikimedia Foundation), What's Missing from the Media Discussion of Wikipedia and Sexism, Wikimedia Blog, 1 May 2013.
• Kevin Morris, "Does Wikipedia's sexism problem really prove that the system works?", The Daily Dot, 1 May 2013.
• Sandip Roy, Wikipedia’s sexist turn: Men are novelists, women are women novelists, AlterNet, 1 May 2013.
• Andrew Leonard, "Wikipedia's shame", Salon, 30 April 2013.
• Amanda Filipacchi, "Sexism on Wikipedia Is Not the Work of 'a Single Misguided Editor', The Atlantic, 30 April 2013.
• Lynn Neary, What's In A Category? 'Women Novelists' Sparks Wiki-Controversy, National Public Radio, 29 April 2013.
• Joseph Reagle, "Wikipedia and gendered categories", reagle.org, 29 April 2013.
• James Gleick, "Wikipedia's Women Problem", The New York Review of Books, 29 April 2013.
• Amanda Filipacchi (27 April 2013). «Wikipedia's Sexism». The New York Times.  (see Amanda_Filipacchi#Wikipedia_op-ed)
• Kevin Rawlinson, "Wikipedia in sexism row after labelling Harper Lee and others 'women novelists' while men are 'American novelists'", The Independent, 26 April 2013.
• Deanna Zandt (26 April 2013). «Yes, Wikipedia is Sexist -- That's Why It Needs You». Forbes. 
• Amanda Filipacchi (24 April 2013). «Wikipedia's Sexism Toward Female Novelists». The New York Times. 
• Adrianne Wadewitz, "Wikipedia is pushing the boundaries of scholarly practice but the gender gap must be addressed", HASTAC, 9 April 2013.

March–January

• Jonathan T. Morgan, Siko Bouterse, Sarah Stierch, Heather Walls (Wikimedia Foundation), "Tea and Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Wikipedia", Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY, 23–27 February 2013, pp. 839–848. doi 10.1145/2441776.2441871
• Netha Hussain, "Wikipedia: Towards Closing the Gender Gap", The Huffington Post, 2 February 2013.
• Joseph Reagle, "The Nuance of the Gendergap Statistics", reagle.org, 30 January 2013.
• Tim Sampson, "The women of Wikipedia: Closing the site's giant gender gap", The Daily Dot, 24 January 2013.
• Joseph Reagle, "'Free as in sexist?' Free culture and the gender gap", First Monday, 18(1), 7 January 2013.

2012

• Nina Bahadur, "Wikipedia Pushes To Cover More Women, Attract Female Editors", The Huffington Post, 25 September 2012.
• David Laniado, et al, "Emotions and dialogue in a peer-production community: the case of Wikipedia", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), 27–29 August 2012.
• Netha Hussain, "Ladies, Let's Contribute To Wikipedia!", Forbes, 22 August 2012.
• Damon Poeter, "Infographic: Wikipedia's Gender Gap Exposed", PC magazine, 8 August 2012.
• Helen Lewis, "Dear The Internet, This Is Why You Can't Have Anything Nice", The New Statesman, 12 June 2012.
• Anita Sarkeesian, "Harassment via Wikipedia Vandalism", Feminist Frequency, 10 June 2012.
• "The Worrying Consequences of the Wikipedia Gender Gap", MIT Technology Review, 19 April 2012.
• Pablo Aragón et al, "Biographical Social Networks on Wikipedia - A cross-cultural study of links that made history", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), this version 4 July 2012, first published 17 April 2012 (for summary, see article above).
• Tbayer, et al, "Gender gap and conflict aversion", Signpost, 27 February 2012.
• Benjamin Collier, Julie Bear, "Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions", Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New York, NY, February 2012. doi 10.1145/2145204.2145265
• "Research: Wikipedia Editor Survey 2012", Wikimedia Foundation (not published as of January 2015).
• Linda Steiner, Stine Eckert, "Wikipedia's Gender Gap", International Communication Association, conference paper, 2012.

2011

• Joseph Reagle, Lauren Rhue, "Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica", International Journal of Communication, 5, 2011, pp. 1138–1158.
• Laura Hale, "Mind the Gap(s)! Writing Styles of Female Editors on Wikipedia", Wikimedia Meta, 7 November 2011.
• Judd Antin, Raymond Yee, Coye Cheshire, Oded Nov, "Gender Differences in Wikipedia Editing", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), 3–5 October 2011.
• Shyong Lam, et al, "WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia's Gender Imbalance", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), 3–5 October 2011.
• Sue Gardner, "On editorial judgment, and empathy", suegardner.org, 28 September 2011.
• "University of Minnesota researchers reveal Wikipedia gender biases", University of Minnesota, 11 August 2011.
• "Wikipedia Editors Study: Results from the Editor Survey", Wikimedia Foundation, April 2011 (estimates that 8.5% of editors are women).
• Sue Gardner, "Nine Reasons Women Don't Edit Wikipedia (in their own words)", suegardner.org, 19 February 2011.
• Michael Bywater, "Wikipedia: This is a man's world", The Independent, 7 February 2011.
• "Where Are the Women in Wikipedia? Introduction", The New York Times, 4 February 2011:

• Susan C. Herring, "Communication Styles Make a Difference".
• Joseph M. Reagle, "'Open' Doesn't Include Everyone".
• Justine Cassell, "Editing Wars Behind the Scenes".
• Terri Oda, "Trolls and Other Nuisances".
• Anna North, "The Antisocial Factor".
• Jessamyn West, "More About Power Than Gender".
• Jane Margolis, "Hearing Women's Voices".
• Henry Etzkowitz, Marina Ranga, "Wikipedia: Nerd Avoidance".

• Noam Cohen, "Define Gender Gap? Look Up Wikipedia’s Contributor List", The New York Times, 30 January 2011.

2010

• Sue Gardner, "Unlocking the Clubhouse: Five ways to encourage women to edit Wikipedia", suegardner.org, 14 November 2010.
• Sook Lim, Nahyun Kwon, "Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?", Library and Information Science Research, 32(3), July 2010, pp. 212–220. doi 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.01.003
• Ruediger Glott, Philipp Schmidt, Rishab Ghosh, "Wikipedia Survey – Overview of Results", United Nations University, March 2010 (12.64% of respondents were female).

2009

• Danielle Keats Citron, "Law's Expressive Value in Combating Cyber Gender Harassment", Michigan Law Review, 108(3), December 2009, pp. 373–415.
• Tanja Carstensen, "Gender Trouble in Web 2.0: Gender Relations in Social Network Sites, Wikis and Weblogs", International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 1(1), 2009.
• Andrew LaVallee, "Only 13% of Wikipedia Contributors Are Women, Study Says", The Wall Street Journal, 31 August 2009.
• "Wikipedia Survey", slideshow, Wikimania, 26 August 2009.

2008

• Jay Walsh, "Wikimedia Foundation and UNU-MERIT announce First Survey of Wikipedians", Wikimedia Foundation, 24 January 2008.

Otros artículos

German

• Dominik Schönleben, "Wikipedia schließt fünf feministische Autoren aus, weil sie den Artikel zu GamerGate bearbeitet haben", WIRED, 30 January 2015.
• Torsten Kleinz, "Sexismus in der Spieleszene: Streit über Gamergate in der Wikipedia", Heise online, 28 January 2015.
• "Eintrag zu 'GamerGate': Wikipedia sperrt feministische Nutzer", Der Standard, 25 January 2015.

Italian

• Paolo Minucci, Perché Wikipedia non è un posto per donne, almeno per ora, ProNews, 3 September 2014.

Spanish

• Rocío P. Benavente, ¿Por qué las mujeres no escriben en la Wikipedia?, El Confidencial, 2 September 2014.

Studies, books (alphabetical)

The following are also listed above.

• Adams, Julia; Brückner, Hannah. "Wikipedia and the Democratization of Academic Knowledge", National Science Foundation (forthcoming).
• Antin, Judd et al. "Gender Differences in Wikipedia Editing", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), 3–5 October 2011.
• Aragón, Pablo et al, "Biographical Social Networks on Wikipedia - A cross-cultural study of links that made history", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), this version 4 July 2012, first published 17 April 2012.
• Bamman, David; Smith, Noel. "Unsupervised Discovery of Biographical Structure from Text", Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2, October 2014, pp. 363–376.
• Carstensen, Tanja. "Gender Trouble in Web 2.0: Gender Relations in Social Network Sites, Wikis and Weblogs", International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 1(1), 2009.
• Citron, Danielle Keats. "Law's Expressive Value in Combating Cyber Gender Harassment", Michigan Law Review, 108(3), December 2009, pp. 373–415.
• Collier, Benjamin; Bear, Julie. "Conflict, criticism, or confidence: an empirical examination of the gender gap in wikipedia contributions", Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, February 2012. doi 10.1145/2145204.2145265
• Dariusz, Jemielniak. Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia, Stanford University Press, 2014 (May).
• Eckert, Stine; Steiner, Linda. "(Re)triggering Backlash: Responses to News About Wikipedia's Gender Gap", Journal of Communication Inquiry, 37(4), October 2013, pp. 284–303. doi 10.1177/0196859913505618
• Eom, Young-Ho, et al, "Interactions of cultures and top people of Wikipedia from ranking of 24 language editions", arXiv. org. arΧiv:1405.7183
• Glott, Ruediger; Schmidt, Philipp; Ghosh, Rishab; "Wikipedia Survey – Overview of Results", United Nations University, March 2010 (12.64% of respondents were female).
• Graells-Garrido, Eduardo, et al, "First Women, Second Sex: Gender Bias in Wikipedia", arxiv, 9 February 2015.
• Hill, Benjamin Mako; Shaw, Aaron. "The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation", PLOS ONE, 26 June 2013 (estimates that 16.1% of editors are female).
• Iosub, Daniela, et al, "Emotions under Discussion: Gender, Status and Communication in Online Collaboration", PLOS ONE, 20 August 2014.
• Lam, Shyong, et al, "WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia's Gender Imbalance", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), 3–5 October 2011.
• Laniado, David, et al, "Emotions and dialogue in a peer-production community: the case of Wikipedia", International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (WikiSym), 27–29 August 2012.
• Lim, Sook; Kwon, Nahyun. "Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?", Library and Information Science Research, 32(3), July 2010, pp. 212–220. doi 10.1016/j.lisr.2010.01.003
• Morgan, Jonathan T.; Bouterse, Siko; Stierch, Sarah; Walls, Heather (Wikimedia Foundation). "Tea and Sympathy: Crafting Positive New User Experiences on Wikipedia", Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 23–27 February 2013, pp. 839–848. doi 10.1145/2441776.2441871
• Reagle, Joseph; Rhue, Lauren. "Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica", International Journal of Communication, 5, 2011, pp. 1138–1158.
• Steiner, Linda; Eckert, Stine. "Wikipedia's Gender Gap", International Communication Association, conference, 2012.
• Tbayer, et al. "Gender gap and conflict aversion", Signpost, 27 February 2012.
• Tkacz, Nathaniel. Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness, University of Chicago Press, 2015.
• Wagner, Claudia, Garcia, David; Jadidi, Mohsen; Strohmaier, Markus. "It's a Man's Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia", arXiv, 26 January 2015. arΧiv:1501.06307
• Wikimedia Foundation. "Wikipedia Editors Study: Results from the Editor Survey", April 2011 (estimates that 8.5% of editors are women).
• Wikimedia Foundation. "Editor Survey 2011/Women Editors".
• Wikimedia Foundation. "Research: Wikipedia Editor Survey 2012" (not published as of March 2015).

Wikimedia Foundation-sponsored studies

Foundation editor survey 2009

• Wikimedia press release] about first, November 2008 survey by Wikimedia Foundation and the United Nations University’s tech-research program MERIT).

• 2009 Wikimania slideshow about the survey.

Foundation editor survey 2010

• Ruediger Glott, Philipp Schmidt, Rishab Ghosh, Wikipedia survey overview, UNU-MERIT (with Wikimedia Foundation), Maastricht, Netherlands, March 2010. Over 58,000 self-selected Wikipedians from 22 language editions in 231 countries responded; contributors reported as about 87% men and 13% women); (Archived original), accessed August 14, 2014.

• Per above Wall Street Journal blog entry on this

Foundation editor survey 2011-#1

• Research:Wikipedia Editors Survey 2011 (Nov. 2010-April 2011) Survey report

• Wikimedia blog entry overview of early 2011 Editor Survey (Search for other blog entries on editor surveys)
• Research proves gender imbalance on Wikipedia, University of Minnesota, on YouTube, August 2011

Foundation editor survey 2011-#2

• Research:Wikipedia Editors Survey November 2011 (April - October 2011) Survey report

• Women Editors Survey overview
• Graphics from above study: Editors reporting harassment outside Wikipedia; Gender balance bar chart (using differing registered vs. editor statistics); Predominantly male pie chart (using 9% female editors statistic)

Foundation editor survey 2012

• Research:Wikipedia Editor Survey 2012 (July-November 2012) (Final report in progress, with discussion of updates on talk page.)

Other Wikimedia studies

• Research:Gender micro-survey of impact VisualEditor might have on gender diversity (in progress)
• Gender Inequality Index studying biographies of men and female by year by ethnicity/nationality (in progress)
• Amanda Menking, Women and Wikipedia assessing existing efforts to address the gender gap (in progress)
• Charting Diversity:Working together towards diversity in Wikipedia, Report produced by Beuth University (Berlin) and Wikimedia Deutschland, 2014
• See also Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Demographics

About Wikimedia Foundation funding of Gender Gap research

• Nontechnical Movement Support: Grants, Evaluation, Legal Support and Communications, "Overall Grantmaking Targets (by the end of June 2015)" section reads in part: "Increase support to challenging the gender gap to at least 1.5 percent of total grants spending, and host at least two diversity events in order to build out an executable gender gap strategy (baseline: 2013-14 YTD grants to gender gap issues ~1 percent; current year’s target: 1 percent)..." accessed August 12, 2014
• WMF Metrics and activities meetings/Quarterly reviews/Grantmaking/September 2014 includes a graphic showing little progress in retaining women editors or increasing content about notable women.

Outside studies

• Tanja Carstensen, Gender Trouble in Web 2.0: Gender Relations in Social Network Sites, Wikis and Weblogs, International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 2009, Vol. 1, No.1
• Laura Hale, Writing styles of women, on Wikimedia, 2011
• Reagle, Joseph; Rhue, Lauren (2011). «Gender Bias in Wikipedia and Britannica.». International Journal of Communication (Joseph Reagle & Lauren Rhue) 5: 1138-1158. 

• See also Joseph Reagle's later comments, The Nuance of the Gendergap Statistics, personal web site, January 30, 2013

• Judd Antin, Raymond Yee, Coye Cheshire, Oded Nov, "Gender Differences in Wikipedia Editing", WikiSym’11, October 3-5, 2011, study funded by Research Fund at UC Berkeley. Perhaps the most significant finding is that male editors tend to make an edit followed by revisions to that edit, whereas women tend to make single, larger edits and less revisions.

• See also overview What the most active female editors contribute, Research:Wikimedia newsletter

• H. T. Welser, D. Cosley, G. Kossinets, A. Lin, F. Dokshin, G. Gay, and M. Smith, Finding social roles in Wikipedia, Proceedings of the 2011 iConference, page 122-129, 2011. (Provides interesting context.)
• Lam, S.; Uduwage, A.; Dong, Z.; Sen, S.; Musicant, D.; Terveen, L.; Reidl, J. (October 2011). «WP:Clubhouse? An Exploration of Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance». WikiSym '11 (ACM). «Quote: "culture that may be resistant to female participation."».  (Notes that contributions of users who identified as women are significantly more likely to be challenged or undone by fellow editors, according to a 2011 report by the University of Minnesota.)

• See also overview University of Minnesota researchers reveal Wikipedia gender biases; Gender gap shows no sign of closing over the past five years, University of Minnesota "Discover", August 11, 2011

• Collier, B., & Bear, J. (2012). “Conflict, criticism, or confidence”. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work- CSCW ’12 (p. 383). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. DOI

• See also overview "Gender gap connected to conflict aversion and lower confidence among women", Sign Post, February 27, 2012

• Steiner, Linda; Eckert, Stine, Wikipedia's Gender Gap, International Communication Association conference paper, 2012.
• Pablo Aragón, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, David Laniado, Yana Volkovich (Barcelona Media Foundation), Biographical Social Networks on Wikipedia - A cross-cultural study of links that made history V2, last revised July 4, 2012, , Proceedings of WikiSym, 2012.

• See over view at: The Worrying Consequences of the Wikipedia Gender Gap, Technology review, April 19, 2012

• Sook Lim; Nahyun Kwon (2010). «Gender differences in information behavior concerning Wikipedia, an unorthodox information source?». Library and Information Science Research 32 (3): 212-220.  DOI

• Damon Poeter, Infographic: Wikipedia's Gender Gap Exposed, PC magazine, August 8, 2012. Report on tech marketing agency KnockTwice research. Includes interesting assertion: "female editors are more likely to get blocked indefinitely on Wikipedia" whose actual source needs researching.

• Laniado, David; Castillo, Carlos; Kaltenbrunner, Andreas; Fuster Morell, Mayo (Aug 27–29, 2012). «Emotions and dialogue in a peer-production community: the case of Wikipedia». WikiSym. Linz, Austria: ACM Press. 
• Collier, B., & Bear, J. (2012). Conflict, criticism, or confidence. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’12 (p. 383). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. PDF • DOI
• Joseph Reagle, “Free as in sexist?” Free culture and the gender gap, First Monday, Volume 18, Number 1, January 2013

• See also Jared Spurbeck, Study Shows Gender Bias in Wikipedia, Linux, originally at Yahoo! News, January 2013

• Benjamin Mako Hill, Aaron Shaw, The Wikipedia Gender Gap Revisited: Characterizing Survey Response Bias with Propensity Score Estimation, June 26, 2013, PLOS ONE, DOI
• ALHCLPP (13 November 2013). «Three Obstacles to Underrepresented Peoples on Wikipedia: the Role Edit-a-Thons Have to Play». The Black Sheep Journal. Consultado el 5 July 2013. 

• Recent research: Survey participation bias analysis: More Wikipedia editors are female, married or parents than previously assumed, July 31, 2013

• “(Re)triggering Backlash: Responses to News About Wikipedia’s Gender Gap". Journal of Communication Inquiry, October 2013, 37 (4): 284. DOI

• "Gender gap coverage in media and blogs" section of a December 5, 2013 Wikimedia blog entry summarizes article. In short: based on a qualitative analysis of 42 articles from US news media and blogs, and 1,336 comments from online readers authors see a “broader backlash against women, and particularly feminism” in the U.S. news media and blogs. They question whether the Wikimedia Foundation is properly addressing the issue.

• Jonathan T. Morgan, Siko Bouterse, Heather Walls, Sarah Stierch, (2013) "Tea and sympathy: crafting positive new user experiences on wikipedia", In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. New York, NY, USA: ACM, CSCW '13, p. 839–848. DOI
• Eszter Hargittai and Aaron Shaw on Internet Skills and Wikipedia's Gender Inequality, Berkman Center for Internet & Society, January 21, 2014
• Laura Hale, The role of English Wikipedia’s top content creators in perpetuating gender bias, WikiNewsReporter, February 20, 2014
• Maximilian Klein, Sex Ratios in Wikidata, Wikipedias, and VIAF I & http://hangingtogether.org/?p=2986 Sex Ratios in Wikidata, Wikipedias, and VIAF I] - March 2013; Sex Ratios in Wikidata Part III, May 21, 2014
• Young-Ho Eom, Pablo Aragón, David Laniado, Andreas Kaltenbrunner, Sebastiano Vigna, Dima L. Shepelyansky, Interactions of cultures and top people of Wikipedia from ranking of 24 language editions, submitted on 28 May 2014 to Computer Science/Social and Information Networks, Cornell University
• Daniela Iosub, et al, "Emotions under Discussion: Gender, Status and Communication in Online Collaboration", PLOS ONE, 20 August 2014 Quote: "A persistent gender difference is that female contributors communicate in a manner that promotes social affiliation and emotional connection more than male editors, irrespective of their status in the community. Female regular editors are the most relationship-oriented, whereas male administrators are the least relationship-focused. Finally, emotional and linguistic homophily is prevalent: editors tend to interact with other editors having similar emotional styles."
• Jemielniak, Dariusz (2014). Common Knowledge? An Ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford University. ISBN 9780804791205. 

In progress

• Julia Adams, Hannah Brueckner, “Wikipedia and the Democratization of Academic Knowledge”, a two-year National Science Foundation grant for exploring gender-specific patterns of representation of scholars and scholarship. One of the project’s goals is to contribute to improving quality and reducing bias on academic – and more general – Wikipedia."