Discusión:Ucranianización
.svg){kind=small}
Untitled[editar]
Esbozo hecho traduciendo la primera parte de la wikipedia en inglés de Ukrainization Shliahov 07:11 12 feb 2008 (UTC)
Nombre de la página[editar]
Si a alguien se le ocurre un nombre mejor, que lo sugiera. La RAE no reconoce ni Ucranianización, ni Ucranización ni Ucranificación. Shliahov 15:06 13 feb 2008 (UTC)
- Si la RAE no dice nada me parece bien que se mantenga. Más que nada por extrapolar los distintos términos que si se utilizan, como romanización. Morza (sono qui) 17:33 14 feb 2008 (UTC) Pensándolo bien me parece mejor Ucranización, que da más resultados y referencias en google.
Referencias[editar]
Dejo aquí algunas referencias para posterior modificación del artículo
Although korenizatsiia promoted non-Russian languages and cultures, it did not prohibit assimilation. Stalin himself vehemently opposed the de-Russification of the Ukrainian proletariat in the mid-1920s.
J.V. Stalin, "Al Camrada Kaganovich y otros miembros del Politburó del Comité Central del Partido Comunsita (b) de Ucrania," en J.V. Stalin, Trabajos (Moscú, 1954), vol. 8, p. 161.
The Soviet state accepted national identity and propagated it, but only to avoid the emergence of a defensive nationalism among the non-Russians
página 13
In order to neutralize non-Russian nationalism, the Soviet party introducedmeasures which would outwardly placate the aroused national feelings of the non- Russians, but limit their true political content, as expressed in the slogan, "national in
form, socialist in content."
página 16
In some republics and regions, the political authorities dismissed bureaucrats and party officials for refusing to learn the indigenous languages.
página 19
By the early 1930s, the party realized that it could not legitimate a revolution byemphasizing national cultures and economically transform that society at the same time without causing social disorder and without encouraging those forces which would challenge the Soviet state unity and the party's political monopoly. In place of korenizatsiia, the party turned to a legitimacy which emphasized Russian primacy within
the USSR.
página 25
George O. Liber; National identity formation;
At this point in time, the Soviet state rejected the idea of sponsoring a Soviet national identity, since many non-Russians would interprete it as a Trojan horse for Russification. Instead, the Soviet state systematically promoted national identities at the sub-state level in the form of national republics, with their own national elites, languages, and cultures. These national cultures had to accommodate the new Soviet high culture and could not contain any fundamentally distinctive religious, legal, ideological or customary features. Soviet citizens, in short, would share a common socialist high culture, but not a common national identity
Terry Martin, "Modernization or Neo-Traditionalism? Ascribed Nationality and Soviet Primordialism," in Sheila Fitzpatrick, ed., Stalinism: New Directions (Nueva York y Londres: Routledge, 2000), pp. 353- 354. ISBN 0-415-15234-8
By respecting the national identities of all Soviet citizens, the Soviet state would depoliticize nationalidentity and demonstrate the superiority of its newly emerging socialist high culture without provoking a nationalist backlash. The eventual universal acceptance of this high culture would result, over the very long term, in the gradual disappearance of separate
national identities.
...those republics where the local forces backing and opposing it were in near equalibrium (such as Ukraine, Belarus, Tatarstan).
Terry Martin The Affirmative Action Empire: Nations and Nationalism ISBN 0801486777; Cornell University Press 2001; p. 13, 221-222.
By the late 1920s and early 1930s a major disagreement between the central authorities and some members of the local elites arose over the goals of korenizatsiia. According to the members of the indigenous elites, korenizatsiiia should: (a) recognize and respect the social, economic, national, and political peculiarities of the non-Russian republics; (b) subsidize and help develop the formerly oppressed and Russified non-Russian cultures; (c) co-opt and promote non-Russian party cadres and governmental bureaucrats; (d) raise the political consciousness of the non-Russians in their native languages in order to build socialism; and (e) dismantle Russian nationalist hegemony in he cities of the non-Russian areas.
Zatonsky, pp. 73-74; Abezgauz, p. 330; Hirchak, p. 25, 43; y Mykola Skrypnyk, “Promova na chervnevomu plenumi TsK KP(b)U 1926,” en Budivnytstvo Radianskoi Ukrainy, Zbirnyk 1 (Járkov, 1929), pp. 33-34.
By the end of the 1920s, the center took the complaints from Russians living inthe non-Russian republics concerning "forced de-Russification" more seriously. Vociferous attacks on the excesses of korenizatsiia, outbreaks of alleged local chauvinism and nationalism also appeared by the end of the decade. Important party leaders, even
Stalin, began to reinterpret Soviet nationality policy.
Leonid Maximenkov, ed., “Stalin's Meeting with a Delegation of Ukrainian Writers, February 1929,” Harvard Ukrainian Studies (1992).
Korenizatsiia, in effect,"institutionalized and legitimated linguistic conflict and thus maintained it and
perpetuated it."
Joane Nagel, “The Political Construction of Ethnicity,” in Susan Olzak and Joane Nagel, eds., Competitive Ethnic Relations (Nueva York, 1986), p. 102.
Havingpainfully learned the lessons of the Civil War, the party did not want to crystallize further the nationalisms of the non-Russians. Hence, the emasculation of korenizatsiia by 1933
and the extensive purges of the non-Russian cadres.
George O. Liber, Soviet Nationality Policy, Urban Growth, and Identity Change in the Ukrainian SSR, 1923-1934 (Cambridge, Inglaterra y Nueva York, 1992).
In the postwar period, the highest percentage of total titles of books, periodicals, and newspapers published....in Ukrainian.....emained below average.
Zev Katz; Handbook of Major Soviet Nationalities, Free Press 1975 p. 460. ISBN 0029170907