Usuario discusión:虞海
Editions[editar]
Yeah, probably the names came from china and India, but those articles are about especifically of japanese traditions. Please stop doing those edits. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 07:52 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- That's not "especifically" of japanese traditions. It's cultures of India, China (incl. Tibetan Vajrayana buddhism), and Japan. Japan is only a country at the end of the route. Using Indian name (origin name) is neutral, considering it's public culture, not culture of a certain country. --虞海 (discusión) 07:56 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- Of course that isn't correct. For example, the article Fudō Myō-ō is especifically about the japanese version of that deity. If you want to also reflect the chinese/indian name you should make a redirection and add the information about the origin and not just erase the existing information. You could also make a new entry about the chinese/indian version, because as you know the japanese version of budism made it's own way and took the national traditions, mixing some customs with shintō. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 08:11 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- If I do that those article will be merged. At least in English Wikipedia it only one article. One deity, one article. --虞海 (discusión) 08:48 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- That's what I told ya, you could merge the information in the same article without just deleting the japanese information. For the last time, keep deleting information in that way. Greetings. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 10:34 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- Well, when the content is complete Japanese I need to for further "conflict, counteract and at last neutralization", otherwise primary and secondary will be inversed. Now I agree to use the Indian origin. --虞海 (discusión) 06:34 4 ene 2010 (UTC)
- That's what I told ya, you could merge the information in the same article without just deleting the japanese information. For the last time, keep deleting information in that way. Greetings. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 10:34 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- If I do that those article will be merged. At least in English Wikipedia it only one article. One deity, one article. --虞海 (discusión) 08:48 27 dic 2009 (UTC)
- Of course that isn't correct. For example, the article Fudō Myō-ō is especifically about the japanese version of that deity. If you want to also reflect the chinese/indian name you should make a redirection and add the information about the origin and not just erase the existing information. You could also make a new entry about the chinese/indian version, because as you know the japanese version of budism made it's own way and took the national traditions, mixing some customs with shintō. --r@ge やった!!!やった!!! 08:11 27 dic 2009 (UTC)